For centuries, Ancient Egypt's mysteries remained hidden in hieroglyphs—a lost language—until the Rosetta Stone unlocked its secrets, revolutionizing history.
In 1799, during Napoleon’s Egyptian campaign, French soldiers discovered a large black basalt slab in Rosetta (now Rashid). Standing 44 inches tall and weighing 1,600 pounds, this artifact later became the key to decoding hieroglyphs.
Deciphering the Code: For decades, scholars worked to crack the linguistic puzzle. It was Jean-François Champollion, a French linguist, who made the breakthrough in 1822.
By comparing the Greek text to the hieroglyphs, he identified phonetic symbols corresponding to royal names like Ptolemy and Cleopatra.
Web development did not begin with startups, JavaScript frameworks, or someone arguing on Twitter about tabs versus spaces. It began with a far more academic concern:
“How do we share documents across different computers without losing our minds?”
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the internet was mostly pipes and protocols—FTP servers, email, and Usenet. Information existed, but it was scattered, ugly, and required arcane knowledge to access. Enter hypertext, the radical notion that documents could link to other documents.
The web was originally a publishing system, not an application platform. This distinction matters more than most modern developers care to admit.
HTML (HyperText Markup Language) was designed to describe what content is, not what it looks like.
Early HTML tags were semantic and structural:
<h1> meant “this is a heading”<p> meant “this is a paragraph”<a> meant “this points somewhere else”<ul> meant “this is a list of things, not a chaotic blob”Notice what’s missing:
No colors. No fonts. No margins. No branding guidelines. No “hero section.”
HTML was intentionally boring. And that was its genius.
Browsers were free to decide how to display a heading or a paragraph, ensuring that content could survive across devices, screen sizes, operating systems, and—critically—time.
HTML is not about aesthetics. It is about meaning.
Of course, humans being humans, we immediately ruined this purity.
As the web gained popularity in the mid-1990s, designers wanted control. Suddenly HTML began sprouting tags like:
<font><center><b> (used for style, not emphasis)This was a problem—not philosophically, but structurally.
Content and presentation became welded together. Changing the look of a site meant rewriting every page. Consistency was fragile. Maintenance was miserable. The web was becoming a house of cards built out of <td> elements.
Something had to give.
CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) was introduced to fix a conceptual mess, not just a visual one.
The idea was radical in its simplicity:
HTML describes structure and meaning.
CSS describes presentation and layout.
By separating these concerns, developers could:
This separation is not arbitrary. It mirrors long-standing academic principles in computer science and design: modularity, abstraction, and separation of concerns.
The word cascading in CSS is not decorative—it is foundational.
The cascade defines how styles are resolved when multiple rules apply to the same element. In other words: when everyone disagrees, who wins?
CSS resolves conflicts through:
This mirrors how meaning flows in real-world systems:
Inheritance allows child elements to absorb properties from their parents—much like language, culture, or academic traditions. You don’t restate the font family for every paragraph; you declare it once and let it propagate.
CSS is less like painting and more like governance.
Modern tooling has made it dangerously easy to forget why HTML and CSS exist as separate layers. Frameworks blur boundaries. Components bundle markup and styles. Inline styles creep back in under new names.
But the original model still matters because the web is not an app runtime—it is a document system that learned how to execute code.
When structure is respected:
When structure is ignored:
HTML is your skeleton.
CSS is your musculature and skin.
Confusing the two leads to… interesting medical outcomes.
At its core, a webpage is not a canvas—it is a hierarchical document.
This is why the web scales the way it does. A single HTML document can be:
Very few platforms in human history have achieved this level of adaptability.
HTML and CSS are not flashy. They do not trend. They do not rebrand themselves every 18 months.
And that’s precisely why they work.
They were designed with restraint, academic discipline, and an understanding that the web would outlive its creators. Every modern web framework—no matter how opinionated—ultimately compiles down to these same primitives.
Strip away the tooling, and you are still left with:
Which, frankly, is a better foundation than most civilizations get.
Web development did not begin as an industry. It began as an idea about information—that structure should endure, style should adapt, and content should remain accessible long after fashion changes.
HTML and CSS aren’t old technologies.
They are patient ones.
And patience, in software, is a rare and underrated virtue.
"Proper web development enables businesses to capture attention in ways not possible before."
“Browsing ancient artifacts and uncovering the historical context of the stories on each relic was a timeless experience”
.svg){kind=logo}